The Fitness Industry Rewards Extremes. Real Life Doesn’t.
For most of my adult life, I have lived inside the fitness industry. I have competed at the highest levels of bodybuilding, trained for photoshoots, worked with clients for more than two decades, and built a career around helping people improve their bodies.
And after all these years, one thing has become very clear to me:
The fitness industry has a tendency to reward extremes.
Real life usually rewards something very different.
Social media loves extremes because extremes are interesting.
The person waking up at 4:00 in the morning to train gets attention.
The person eating the exact same meal every day for 12 weeks gets attention.
The person training twice a day gets attention.
The shredded physique gets attention.
The brutal transformation gets attention.
Nobody makes a viral video about someone exercising four days a week, eating mostly well, sleeping seven hours, going out to dinner with their family, and maintaining a healthy body composition for 15 years.
But that person may actually be doing fitness better than almost everyone else.
I Used to Believe More Was Better
When you spend enough time in competitive fitness, extreme behavior starts to feel normal. There were periods of my life when everything revolved around training. Meals were scheduled precisely, workouts were rarely missed, body fat percentages mattered, cardio was calculated, food was measured, and progress was constantly evaluated.
When you are preparing for something like a bodybuilding competition, that level of commitment can be necessary. The mistake happens when we start applying competition standards to normal life.
A bodybuilding contest has a finish line.
Life does not.
Most people are not preparing to stand under stage lights at five percent body fat. They are trying to feel better when they wake up, have more energy, feel confident in their clothes, improve their health, stay strong as they age, and enjoy their lives without feeling like fitness has to control every decision they make.
Those are very different goals.
Fitness Has Somehow Become a Test of Suffering
One of the strangest things about fitness culture is how often suffering becomes evidence that something is working. If the workout was miserable, it must have been effective. If the diet feels restrictive, it must be disciplined. If someone trains seven days a week, they must be more committed.
We sometimes even admire people for skipping dinners, birthdays, vacations, or social events because their fitness routine does not allow room for them.
But suffering and effectiveness are not the same thing.
A workout does not need to destroy you to stimulate muscle. A diet does not need to make you miserable to produce fat loss. You do not need to train every day to become strong, and your entire social life does not need to disappear because you decided you wanted to improve your body.
In fact, the older I have gotten and the more people I have trained, the more I have realized that the best fitness programs often look surprisingly boring. They are repetitive, predictable, and leave room for life.
Most importantly, they are sustainable.
The Best Program Is Not the Most Impressive One
People constantly ask questions like: What is the best workout split?
What is the perfect diet?
How many days should I train?
What is the fastest way to lose fat?
What is the most effective cardio?
Those questions make sense, but there is another question that should probably come first:
What can you realistically keep doing?
Because the perfect program performed for three weeks will almost always lose to the good program performed for three years.
I have watched this play out countless times with clients. Someone starts highly motivated and decides they are going to train six days per week, cut out every food they enjoy, stop drinking, track everything, and push as hard as possible. For a few weeks, they feel unstoppable.
Then work gets busy. A child gets sick. Travel happens. Sleep suffers. Motivation drops. Suddenly the routine that looked impressive on paper becomes impossible to maintain.
And because they cannot maintain the extreme version, they often abandon everything.
This is where fitness becomes unnecessarily binary. People believe they are either “on” or “off,” either eating perfectly or eating terribly, either training six days per week or not training at all.
Real progress rarely works that way.
Let's also discuss that many of the workouts many see these days on social media do not take in consideration the fact that most people aren't taking enhancing drugs to keep up with either the high volume nor high intensity these workouts may take to recover from. But because they are seen as extremes people pay attention to them instead of the "traditional boring" basics that have built healthy bodies for decades.
Consistency Is Usually Much Less Exciting
Some of the most successful people I have worked with were not the most intense.
They were simply very good at returning.
They went on vacation and came back to training.
They had stressful weeks and resumed their routine afterward.
They enjoyed dinners without turning one meal into a seven-day binge.
They missed workouts without convincing themselves the entire week was ruined.
That ability to return is one of the most underrated skills in fitness.
Consistency does not mean never missing.
Consistency means never disappearing for very long.
Your Life Should Determine Your Fitness Program
One of the biggest changes in the way I coach today compared with earlier in my career is that I spend much more time considering the life around the workout.
Someone working 60 hours per week probably should not train like a professional athlete.
A parent with three young children may not have the recovery capacity of a 22-year-old college student. Someone dealing with a stressful period in life may temporarily need less training volume, not more motivation.
An older lifter with decades of training behind them may benefit more from protecting their joints than proving how much weight they can still move.
Context matters.
Good coaching is not about forcing everyone into the theoretically optimal program. It is about finding the most effective program that works within that person's actual life.
Sometimes that means four workouts instead of six. Sometimes it means 45 minutes instead of 90. Sometimes it means maintaining instead of progressing. Sometimes it means eating pizza with your family and not feeling guilty about it.
That is not failure.
That is what sustainability looks like.
Fitness Should Expand Your Life, Not Shrink It
This may be the biggest lesson fitness has taught me.
Fitness is supposed to make your life better. It should give you more energy, confidence, physical freedom, resilience, and more years of independence. It should allow you to travel, hike, play sports, pick up your children, move furniture, climb stairs, and enjoy your body.
But sometimes people become so obsessed with being fit that their world becomes smaller. They avoid restaurants, fear vacations, feel guilty when they miss workouts, judge themselves constantly in the mirror, stop enjoying food, and become anxious when their routine changes.
At that point, fitness may still be improving the body while making life worse.
That is a tradeoff worth questioning.
There Is a Time for Extremes
I am not against extremes. I have chosen them many times myself.
There is something valuable about discovering what you are capable of when you completely commit to something. Preparing for a bodybuilding competition requires sacrifice. Training for a marathon requires sacrifice. Pursuing an elite athletic goal often requires sacrifice.
There is nothing wrong with temporarily organizing your life around an ambitious goal.
The important word is temporarily.
You need to understand what season you are in. There are seasons for pushing, seasons for maintaining, seasons for recovering, and seasons where simply keeping fitness somewhere on the priority list is a victory.
The problem begins when we believe every season has to be a pushing season.
After More Than Two Decades, My Definition of Fitness Has Changed
When I was younger, fitness was largely about what my body could look like. Then it became about what my body could achieve.
Today I think much more about what my body will still allow me to do decades from now.
I still care about muscle. I still care about being lean. I still enjoy training hard. Those things are part of who I am.
But longevity, mobility, cardiovascular fitness, joint health, recovery, and quality of life matter more to me today than they once did.
That shift did not happen because I became less serious about fitness.
It happened because my definition of fitness became larger.
The goal is no longer just building a body that looks impressive today. The goal is building a body that continues serving you tomorrow.
The Fitness Industry Will Always Celebrate the Outliers
That is probably never going to change. Extreme physiques will get attention. Extreme workouts will get views. Extreme diets will create headlines. There will always be someone training harder, eating cleaner, waking up earlier, doing more cardio, or pushing further.
You do not have to compete with them.
Your fitness does not need to impress the internet. It needs to improve your life.
Train hard enough to become stronger. Eat well enough to stay healthy. Recover enough to keep progressing.
Push yourself when the goal calls for it, but make sure there is still room to actually enjoy the life you are supposedly getting fit to live.
Because the fitness industry may reward extremes.
Real life usually rewards consistency.
If you’re interested in exploring this idea further, I’d also recommend reading my book, Fitting In: The Mask of Health. In it, I take a deeper look at how modern society has come to treat the outward appearance of the body as a kind of shorthand for health, even when that image may tell us very little about what is actually happening beneath the surface.
We live in a culture that often celebrates visible leanness, muscularity, youth, and aesthetic perfection, while far less glamorous markers of health like sleep, stress management, cardiovascular fitness, bloodwork, mobility, nutrition quality, and emotional well-being rarely receive the same attention. The problem is that looking healthy and being healthy are not always the same thing.
The book examines how these expectations can shape the way we view ourselves and others, and why a more complete definition of health should include both the exterior and the interior. Sometimes the healthiest lifestyle is not the most dramatic, impressive, or marketable one. Often, it is the quieter, more sustainable habits that truly matter most over time.
*Let's not forget that between new AI modifications, photoshop filters and many more tactics, images like the main one you see here on the top are modified to enhance physiques that are already very hard to obtain naturally.
Comments